Bombay High Court protects Asha Bhosle’s personality rights
against AI misuse

Bhosle had approached the Court against several defendants, including Mayk Inc, an AI company allegedly offering cloned versions of her voice; Amazon Seller Services Pvt Ltd and Flipkart Internet Pvt Ltd, for displaying and selling posters and merchandise using her likeness without consent; an independent artist selling apparel with her image; and Google LLC, as the operator of YouTube, where AI-generated videos imitating her voice had been uploaded.

Her petition emphasized that such misuse undermines her reputation and goodwill built over a career spanning 82 years, during which she has recorded songs across genres and won multiple national and international awards, including the Dadasaheb Phalke Award, Padma Vibhushan, and two Grammy nominations.

The Court granted her ad-interim relief, observing that the balance of convenience lay entirely in Bhosle’s favour.

Justice Doctor issued the strongest directions against AI platforms and sellers (defendants 1, 2, and 5 in Bhosle’s plaint).

The Court has restrained them from using, exploiting or misappropriating Bhosle’s name, voice, vocal style, technique, manner of singing, photograph, image, likeness, signature, persona or any other attributes of her personality, for any commercial or personal gain. This includes, but is not limited to, through the use of AI voice models, generative artificial intelligence, machine learning, or face morphing, without her written consent.

The Court also ordered these defendants to remove all infringing material identified in Bhosle’s plaint, including cloned voice recordings, merchandise, and digital content, and to deliver up copies of such material, whether in physical or digital form, for destruction.

The Court further directed Amazon and Flipkart (defendants 3 and 4) to remove all infringing listings identified in the plaint within one week and to ensure that similar unauthorised listings using Bhosle’s image or likeness are taken down when notified.

Google/ YouTube (defendant 6) was ordered to take down the specific infringing URLs annexed to the plaint and to remove similar AI-generated content from YouTube when reported.

All platforms were also directed to provide Bhosle with basic subscriber or seller information of infringing parties — including names, contact details, IP logs, and payment details — to enable her to pursue further legal remedies.

While passing its ruling, the Court relied on caselaws such as the Bombay High Court’s ruling in Arijit Singh v. Codible Ventures LLP (2024) and the Delhi High Court’s ruling in Aishwarya Rai Bachchan v. Aishwaryaworld.com (2025), both of which recognized unauthorized AI-driven exploitation of celebrity attributes as violations of personality rights

Justice Doctor also noted that the absence of some defendants despite service of notice only strengthened Bhosle’s claim. The matter will be heard next on October 13, 2025

Asha Bhosle was represented by Advocate Ankit Lohia, with Advocates Vikram Trivedi, Rashid Boatwalla, Lipsa Unadkat and Garima Jain, instructed by Manilal Kher Ambalal & Co.